This post is my 50th, a significant milestone. It is also my first post after an accident I suffered in
Tag: Chronological accuracy
Reality Checks for Ancient Chronology: Astronomical Datapoints and Verification
The advocates of the conventional model of second millennium BCE Middle Eastern chronology have argued for the accuracy of their
Genuinely Scientific Data Are Not Necessarily Accurate: Ice Core Dating
Ice core dating is a scientific technique with multiple applications. It is also of value for ancient Middle Eastern chronology,
Genuinely Scientific Data Are Not Necessarily Accurate: Dendrochronology
Dendrochronology can be a very valuable tool for determining the ages of ancient wooden artifacts, wooden building parts, and objects
Genuinely Scientific Data Are Not Necessarily Accurate: Astronomical Dating
Scholars of ancient history generally recognize that contemporaneous records of ancient astronomical observations can potentially yield precisely accurate dates for
Genuinely Ancient Records Are Not Necessarily Accurate
Many researchers approach the subject of historical chronology with the fundamental premise that ancient inscriptions have accurate chronological data. However,
Middle Chronology Advocates’ Efforts to Expand One Century into Two
Multiple astronomical anchors and other scientific data demonstrate that the Middle Chronology model of the Venus Tablets of Ammi-şaduqa during
Examples of Altering Data to Conform with Traditions
The previous post discussed the problem that researchers tend to start with: the premise that conventional views of chronology are
The Bad Habit of Reinterpreting Data to Conform with Tradition (Or How to Cook a Frog)
Ancient Middle Eastern chronology is complex and involves many data types from various empires, kingdoms, and regions. While interpreting that
Astronomically Anchoring the Aegean Dendrochronology Increases Its Value Immensely
Radiocarbon dating can narrow the ages of tree rings to a theoretical range of years. (However, regional offsets sometimes cause